<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New South Wales, AU: register your surveillance cameras with police</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fightingcrimefromabove.com/new-south-wales-au-register-your-surveillance-cameras-with-police/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fightingcrimefromabove.com/new-south-wales-au-register-your-surveillance-cameras-with-police/</link>
	<description>A blog about surveillance cameras in public and private spaces</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:26:20 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Honovich</title>
		<link>http://fightingcrimefromabove.com/new-south-wales-au-register-your-surveillance-cameras-with-police/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>John Honovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 05:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fightingcrimefromabove.com/?p=757#comment-130</guid>
		<description>&quot;If a gunshot detector goes off, police can find the closest cameras based on a geomap, and proceed to log-in to the private camera systems to search for suspects immediately.&quot;

Public remote logging in to private camera systems is logistically infeasible for 90%+ of private cameras.  There are hundreds of different video surveillance recorders, all of which require different client software/APIs. Plus, the municipality would require access into the LANs of private companies which is unlikely to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;If a gunshot detector goes off, police can find the closest cameras based on a geomap, and proceed to log-in to the private camera systems to search for suspects immediately.&#034;</p>
<p>Public remote logging in to private camera systems is logistically infeasible for 90%+ of private cameras.  There are hundreds of different video surveillance recorders, all of which require different client software/APIs. Plus, the municipality would require access into the LANs of private companies which is unlikely to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Roush</title>
		<link>http://fightingcrimefromabove.com/new-south-wales-au-register-your-surveillance-cameras-with-police/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Roush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fightingcrimefromabove.com/?p=757#comment-128</guid>
		<description>The NSW camera registration link can be found &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.police.nsw.gov.au/services/how_to_.._general/i_want_to_register_my_business_cctv_details&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  As far as technical minimum levels go, the city of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.el-cerrito.org/police/pdf/ord_2ndreading_as_revised_10012007.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;El Cerrito&lt;/a&gt; did some good work in their specifications.  

The good thing about a mandatory registration for businesses is it would give a city a good count of the number of cameras in the community.  It&#039;s impossible to keep track of those numbers unless a program like this is implemented.  It&#039;s my belief that private cameras outweigh public cameras by a ratio of at least 10:1 and that ratio will only get higher .  

Example: If a gunshot detector goes off, police can find the closest cameras based on a geomap, and proceed to log-in to the private camera systems to search for suspects immediately.  This in combination with officer deployment tactics can increase the potential for an arrest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NSW camera registration link can be found <a href="http://www.police.nsw.gov.au/services/how_to_.._general/i_want_to_register_my_business_cctv_details" rel="nofollow">here</a>.  As far as technical minimum levels go, the city of <a href="http://www.el-cerrito.org/police/pdf/ord_2ndreading_as_revised_10012007.pdf" rel="nofollow">El Cerrito</a> did some good work in their specifications.  </p>
<p>The good thing about a mandatory registration for businesses is it would give a city a good count of the number of cameras in the community.  It&#039;s impossible to keep track of those numbers unless a program like this is implemented.  It&#039;s my belief that private cameras outweigh public cameras by a ratio of at least 10:1 and that ratio will only get higher .  </p>
<p>Example: If a gunshot detector goes off, police can find the closest cameras based on a geomap, and proceed to log-in to the private camera systems to search for suspects immediately.  This in combination with officer deployment tactics can increase the potential for an arrest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Honovich</title>
		<link>http://fightingcrimefromabove.com/new-south-wales-au-register-your-surveillance-cameras-with-police/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>John Honovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fightingcrimefromabove.com/?p=757#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Any idea what registering consists of? I assume this helps police to know where systems. Does it make it any easier for them to retrieve or to ensure that systems meet minimum quality levels?

If it&#039;s just letting police know where systems are, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s of much benefit. It&#039;s pretty easy for police to ask adjoining business and residences after a crime if they have systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any idea what registering consists of? I assume this helps police to know where systems. Does it make it any easier for them to retrieve or to ensure that systems meet minimum quality levels?</p>
<p>If it&#039;s just letting police know where systems are, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s of much benefit. It&#039;s pretty easy for police to ask adjoining business and residences after a crime if they have systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
